It is commonly held that the cardinal electors
who chose Jorge Bergoglio to be the new pope were giving him the mandate to
reform the Church, with iummediate attention to the Curia. Pope Francis took on that task,
notably in forming his “Group of Nine,” cardinals from around the world who
form an advisory (and investigative) panel to help him in his role as leader of
the Catholic Church.
His efforts to reform the Curia include not simply
structural changes but spiritual conversion as well. He famously reminded the
curial staff just before Christmas in 2014 that they must
not think of themselves as “lords of the manor” but as servants, and he went on
to an examination of conscience listing 15 temptations (he called them “la
malattia” or “the disease’) which they should avoid now and in the future.
Reform of the Curia is not complete. There is a staying
power in the curial structure that resists change. Some critics of the Curia during
the Second Vatican Council said that bureaucrats had a not-so-secret refrain among themselves: “Councils come and go, popes die, but the Curia goes on!” Reform of the Vatican Bank, however, with
significant structural changes appears imminent.
From the start of his papacy, however, Pope Francis
has been as much concerned about reform of the world as he is about reform of the Vatican and the Church at large. He
consistently urges Christians to go out to the peripheries –to places on the
margins of society, to people suffering from conflicted lives and broken
hearts.
His first official journey was to Lampadusa, the
small Sicilian island which has become the port of entry for refugees fleeing
poverty and political turmoil in Africa. Thousands of these migrants have
drowned as they attempt to cross the
Mediterranean in over-crowded boats and small rafts. In a special Mass on the
island Pope Francis welcomed the migrants, mourned those who have died in their
attempt to improve their lives, thanked those who were caring for the refugees,
and warned the world at large about “the globalization of indifference.” He also asked
pardon for "those, whose decisions at a global level have created the
conditions which have led us to this drama."
Pope Francis’ remarks about climate
and economy have generated significant critical responses. For example, radio’s
talk show guru Rush Limbaugh has judged Pope Francis to be guilty of Marxism
because of the pope’s condemnation of “unfettered
capitalism.” El Rushbo labeled as “communism” Pope Francis’ concern about
man-made global warming. He also took offense at the pope’s remark that “if Christians don't dig deep and generously open
their wallets, they do not have genuine faith.”
Retracing his steps
Limbaugh did admit, “Now, maybe this is not communism, I don't know, but it's
scary, and it's a little out there. Remember what all this is related to
is climate change, folks. Every bit of this is related to climate change.”
Then, unable to let go of it, he added, “A
man of religion, the Vicar of Christ, seems to have fallen in with the
communist way of doing things: Controlling mankind through command-and-control
governments backed by police or military power. This is what the pope is
essentially calling for. The problem is, human beings suffer under
collectivist or communist regimes. They do not prosper.”
Clearly Pope Francis
has irritated one of America’s staunchest defenders of capitalism, one of its
most out-spoken critics of made-made climate change. Pope Francis has done what
he intended; he or more accurately his message has challenged the mindset of
those who are comfortable in their convictions and who resent their values
being questioned.
Pope Francis is
reaching out to the world. He is exercising the pope’s role as a prophet. He is
coming to the defense of those who are impoverished, who are victims of
injustice, who do not have protection of their God-given rights of life,
liberty and the pursuit of happiness.
I do not know whether
the pope is right in his judgment about global warming; I doubt that capitalism
is in itself an evil economic system.
But I do believe that Pope Francis looks at the world at large and is
conscious of environmental and economic conditions far different from and more depraved
than what we see and experience in our part of the world.
The role of a prophet,
it is said, is to comfort the afflicted and afflict the comfortable. Pope Francis’ namesake did an admirable job of
doing that very thing. The little friar of Assisi challenged the habits of
society in celebrating Christmas when he said, “If I could speak to the emperor
I would ask that a general law be made that all who can should scatter corn and
grain along the roads so that the birds might have an abundance of food on the day
of such great solemnity, especially our sisters the larks” (Celano, II, 200).
I suspect Francis of
Assisi might be labeled a Marxist for suggesting that when the weather was cold
he would ask a rich man to give him a cloak, and would tell him, “I will accept this from you with this
understanding, that you do not expect ever to have it back again.” And then,
when Francis met a poor man, he would clothe him with what he had received
with such joy and gladness (Celano, I, 76).
When we are unaware of
the conditions in which some people must live we are not likely to feel
compassion for them or want to change the structures that cause their misery.
For example, many of us think of human trafficking as a problem in other parts
of the world, but when we learn that more than 17,500 are trafficked in the
United States every year (stats from US Department of Justice), then we may
become concerned enough to do something about this modern form of slavery
(trading people for forced labor or prostitution) happening especially in
California and Texas.
If we learn that more
than 10% of the US population lives in poverty, we may blame them for laziness,
but when we encounter that poverty in the inner city homeless or the Appalachian
shack dwellers, we may respond differently.
As I see it, Pope
Francis is engaged in raising consciousness. I can always find arguments to
temper my response. I know from being a pastor in a poor neighborhood that some
of the poor play the game, that some are unequivocally lazy, that some
take advantage of the government dole or the generosity of donors. I also know
that there are many others who through bad choices or no-fault of their own
are truly poor –economically, psychologically, mentally, spiritually.
I found adults who were
abused as children and that abuse has left a permanent scar. I found people
struggling to make things better for themselves, but found the bureaucracy of
the welfare system a nightmare of forms, appointments, and regulations. (You
have an appointment for 8 am, you do not have a car and must take the
bus, you have two young children who need to board the school bus at 8:30 am –What
do you do about the kids? What do you do if the bus route doesn’t go where you
need to be? What do you do if you are late and you need to re-schedule?)
Pope Francis has
undertaken the role of prophet. In that role he will irritate some, provide
comfort for those in need, inform those who never thought of a given situation,
and touch people of good will. Whether you believe in global warming or not,
his message urges care for the environment –which is a good thing. Whether or
not you buy his criticism of capitalism, his message urges you to be careful
not to put money over people --which is a good thing.
On his return flight from Latin America, Pope Francis said he is aware of the negative reaction his comments about capital;ism have generated in the United States, and he agreed that he must listen to his critics and enter into dialogue with them. "If I don't dialogue with those who criticize," he explained, " then I have no right to express an opinion." He said he intends to study these criticisms before his visit to the United States and Cuba in September in order to prepare for the dialogue.
On his return flight from Latin America, Pope Francis said he is aware of the negative reaction his comments about capital;ism have generated in the United States, and he agreed that he must listen to his critics and enter into dialogue with them. "If I don't dialogue with those who criticize," he explained, " then I have no right to express an opinion." He said he intends to study these criticisms before his visit to the United States and Cuba in September in order to prepare for the dialogue.
All Christians are
called by their baptism to share in Christ’s role of being priest, prophet and
servant leader. Pope Francis is modeling the Christian’s response. Right now he
is emphasizing the prophetic role. The afflicted are being comforted, the
comfortable are being afflicted. That’s what happens when prophets come on the
scene.
No comments:
Post a Comment