There is unrest in the Church today.
One example is the formation of priests' associations in Austria , Germany ,
Ireland , Australia , the Philippines ,
and the United States .
Members of the clergy are calling attention to what seems to them to be the
abuse of power by the Vatican
and a decided move away from the reforms and direction set by the Second Vatican
Council.
The Austrian priests' group is calling for the development
and publication of a kind of "bill of rights" for the people of God
plus a structure for participation of the people in the decision-making authority
of the Church. Sensus fidelium is
still a valid theological dynamic.
Msgr. Helmut Schuller, former vicar general of the
Archdiocese of Vienna, speaking on behalf of the 500 members of the Austrian
priests' association, believes that the way many bishops and the pope have
separated themselves from the views of the majority is a danger to the unity of
the Church.
The Austrian association's initial call for
"disobedience" as a measure
for reform alienated Vatican authorities, and
prompted the pope to insist that the only way to renewal is through obedience
and a focus on Jesus.
Schuller has asked the Vatican
for a chance to talk about their position and explain what they mean by
"disobedience" but the Vatican has not responded to their
request.
If Yves Congar were
to address the stalemate between the priests' association and the Curia, he
would most assuredly recommend that both sides focus on four things: 1) the primacy of charity and pastoral concerns;
2) remaining in communion with the whole Church; 3) having patience with
delays; and 4) seeking genuine renewal through a return to the principle of
tradition.
Congar's advice can easily be gleaned from his 1950
masterpiece, True and False Reform in the
Church. Each of his four conditions requires explanation and application if
there is to be productive reform and the avoidance of schism.
Theologian and law professor Father Ladislaus Orsy, SJ, suggests that one of the factors in the move
toward the centralization of authority in the Vatican can be traced back to the
eleventh century Pope Gregory VII. In an effort to purify the Church from secular
influence, Gregory relied less on episcopal synods, and thereby changed the
relationships between bishops and the Holy See.
This trend toward centralizing in Rome was exacerbated by the Protestant
Reformation. A consequence of this centralizing of power in the papacy was the
loss of the tradition of "communio,"
that is, the Church as a union of persons created by the Spirit of Christ.
"The Eastern churches," Orsy explains,
"remained more faithful to the ancient doctrine of synodality, and the two
branches of the same tree kept growing in different directions." At one
point in the 11th century the tree split, and schism ensued.
{Synodality can be understood as councils, especially of
bishops, sharing in the authority given the Church by Christ. The Eastern
churches still operate in this fashion. The Roman Catholic Church, however, is
less reliant on synods; the role and the authority of synods of bishops in the
Roman branch are faint shadows of synods in the East.}
In Orsy's explanation, "The church was increasingly
perceived, in places high and low, as a rigidly hierarchical institution where
divine gifts (except those conferred by the sacraments) descended on the
community through the mediation of the popes, bishops, and clergy."
Pope John XXIII and the ecumenical council of 1962-65 challenged that dynamic. Blessed John's
aggiornamento in this case turned out to be a return to the older tradition,
namely the understanding that the Spirit is poured out on all the people
of God. We see that understanding in Lumen
Gentium, where the theology of the people of God comes before the theology
of the hierarchy.
Orsy continues, "There is a growing belief among the
people that the church is a communio of
persons --of all persons. This communio
cannot be identified with the pope, or the bishops, or the priests, or with any
particular group."
The communio of
the Church is the Holy Spirit in the many. "Briefly but
substantially," says Orsy, "this is the theological reality of communio" (cf. Receiving the Council by Ladislaus Orsy (Liturgical Press, 2009).
It is this notion of communio
that provokes the call for decentralization of power in Rome
(the conferences of bishops have been emasculated) and leads priests'
associations in various parts of the world to call for dialogue with Rome . Congar's advice
remains applicable.
No comments:
Post a Comment